Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Didi and Baic signed a strategic cooperation agreement to build a new energy vehicle operator[2018/03/08]
-
With the coming of the new energy automobile, what is the future of traditional energy vehicles?[2018/03/09]
-
Firm considers licensing method to transform gas into plastic products[2016/11/03]
-
Bengals Support Cincinnati Bell Connector with Free Parking Offer[2016/09/24]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Replacement Still Problematic? Users Complain Over New Battery Issues[2016/09/26]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]